SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 628

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Manju Devi – Appellant
Versus
Hari Narayan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Ram Sharan Sharma, for Appellants;
Smt. Chitra Goyal, for Respondent No.3

RAFIQ, J.—Service of notice on respondents no.1 and 2 is dispensed with. Application bearing inward No.12317 dated 17.4.2012 stands allowed.

2. Claimants have preferred this appeal dissatisfied with quantum of compensation of Rs.6,05,000/-, awarded by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shahpura, District Jaipur, vide its award dated 07.03.2009 in MAC Case No.160/2008. Award was passed in a death claim where one Mahesh Kumar died in a road accident.

3. Only contention raised by learned counsel for appellants is that as per ratio of judgment of the Supreme Court in Sarla Verma (Smt.) and Others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another – (2009) 6 SCC 121 = 2009(1) CCR 276 (SC) = 2009(4) RLW 2785 (SC), deduction of 1/4th ought to have been made by learned Tribunal for own expenses of deceased out of his accepted monthly income of Rs.3,750/-, because number of dependents are five.

4. Learned counsel for respondent insurance company opposed appeal and submitted that father and mother could not be said to be solely dependent on deceased and learned Tribunal rightly deducted 1/3rd for own expenses of the deceased.

5. Having heard learned counsel for parties and perusing material on rec



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top