SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 944

KARAN SINGH RATHORE
Kanchan Devi – Appellant
Versus
Kesara – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Shyam Babu, for Petitioner;
Hemraj, for Caveator-Respondent

jkBkSM+] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh /kkjk 230 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ds vUrxZr lgk;d dysDVj] cLlh ds vkns'k fnukad 19-7-2011 ds fo:) is'k dh xbZ gSA

2- fuxjkuh dks fopkjkFkZ xzg.k fd;s tkus ij nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl lquh xbZA

3- fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd izkfFkZ;k us viuh cgl esa rdZ fn;k fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa oknh vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 ls 6 us ,d okn ckcr foHkktu o ?kks"k.kk dk is'k fd;kA izkfFkZ;ka mDr okn esa izfroknh gSA uksfVl rkehy gksus ij izkfFkZ;k us Jh lq/khjth 'kekZ dks odhy fu;qDr fd;kA izkfFkZ;k odhy ds Hkjksls esa jgh ,oa odhy dh ykijokgh ls izkfFkZ;ka ds fo:) ,drjQk dk;Zokgh dk vkns'k fnukad 3-9-2009 dks gks x;kA mDr ,drjQk vkns'k dks fujLr djkus gsrq izkfFkZ;ka us vkns'k 9 fu;e 7 lhihlh dk izkFkZuk i= is'k fd;kA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us vkyksP; vkns'k fnukad 19-7-2011 ls mDr izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt dj fn;kA

4- fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us cgl esa vkxs rdZ fn;k fd izkfFkZ;k xzkeh.k ifjos'k dh vui<+ efgyk gS] ftls dkuwu dh tkudkjh ugha gSA odhy dh ykijokgh ls izkfFkZ;k ds fo:) dk;Zokgh gqbZ gSA izkfFkZ;k tokcnkok is'k dj viuk i{k izLrqr djuk pkgrh gSA okn vHkh lk{; oknh esa gh py jgk gSA vr% fuxjkuh Lohdkj dh tkosA

5- fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd vizkFkhZ la[;k 2 us viuh cgl esa rdZ fn;k fd







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top