SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 110

SUBODH AGRAWAL
Majid Khan – Appellant
Versus
Salim Khan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Mukesh Jain, for Petitioner;
Sunil Pareek, for Respondent No.1

AGARWAL, M.—This is a revision petition under Section 84 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (in short `the Act') against the judgment dated 20.1.2004 passed by Revenue Appellate Authority Sikar.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that Patwari Halka Kasli submitted a report before Tehsildar Sikar that in Svt. 2058 mentioning that the non-petitioner No. 1 has trespassed on 0.03 hectare of land in khasra No. 394 measuring 2.65 hectare. Thereupon Tehsildar initiated proceeding under Section 91 of the Act against the non-petitioner. During the course of proceedings under Section 91 of the Act, it came to the knowledge that the non-petitioner No. 1 has a `patta' of the disputed and which has been regularised in his favour. Hence the Tehsildar dropped the proceedings under Section 91 of the Act vide judgment dated 31.5.2001. Aggrieved against this order of Tehsildar, the present petitioner, submitted an appeal before District Collector Sikar who dismissed the appeal in his judgment dated 5.2.2002. This order was further challenged by the petitioner before the Revenue Appellate Authority, Sikar who also dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner vide judgment dated 20.1.200












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top