SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 211

BELA M.TRIVEDI
Dev Bai – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Civil Judge No. 1, Kota – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Ravi Kasliwal, for Petitioner;
Shailesh Prakash Sharma, for Respondents-Defendants

Hon'ble TRIVEDI, J.—The present petition is directed against the order dated 25.11.2004 passed by the learned Addl. Civil Judge (JD), No. 1 (South), Kota (hereinafter referred to as `the Trial Court') in Civil Suit No. 356/2000, whereby the Trial Court has allowed the application of the respondents (original-defendants) filed under Order 7 Rule 11 rejecting the plaint of the petitioner-original plaintiff.

2. The short facts giving rise to the present petition are that the petitioner-plaintiff has filed the suit before the Trial Court seeking cancellation of the sale deed dated 11.6.1984 executed in favour of the defendants, by one Smt. Mangibai in respect of suit property and seeking possession of the said property. It was averred in the plaint interalia that the petitioner-plaintiff happened to be daughter of Shri Narain and Smt. Kesharbai. After the death of Kesharbai and her father Narain, the petitioner-plaintiff alone was the legal heir of her father Shri Narain. According to the petitioner-plaintiff, the possession of the plaintiff in respect of the suit land was sought to be disturbed by the said Mangibai and others in March, 1992 and at that time she came to know for the fir


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top