SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 1460

(Board of Revenue for Rajasthan)
Forest Expansion Officer Vs. P.S. Samod Gramin (Saharan, M.)
TARA CHAND SAHARAN, MEMBER
B.L. NAVAL, MEMBER
Forest Expansion Officer, Social Forestry, Chaumu
Versus
Police Station Samod Gramin
Appeal Decree/2163/2003/Jaipur, decided on 21.12.2011

Advocates Appeared
R.K. Gupta, for Appellant;
Bhawani Singh, for Respondent

Headnote:Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, Sec. 188 — Suit for permanent injunction — Dispute is between two departments of the State Govt. — Jurisdiction of the Board of Revenue to hear it — Held — Suit between two departments of State Govt. is not maintainable, so also the appeal there against — Not envisaged in constitution or C.P.C. — Such practice is deterimental to public interest. (Paras 7 to 9)

       Appeal dismissed.

        jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955] /kkjk 188 & LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKkFkZ okn & fookn jkT; ljdkj ds nks foHkkxksa ds e/; gS & bls lquokbZ dh jktLo e.My dh vf/kdkfjrk & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & jkT; ljdkj ds nks foHkkxksa ds e/; okn iks"k.kh; ugha rFkk mlds fo:) vihy Hkh iks"k.kh; ugha & lafo/kku ;k fl-iz-la- esa dksbZ O;oLFkk ugha &,slh izFkk tufgr ds fy, ?kkrd gSA

       vihy [kkfjt dhA ¼in la[;k 7 ls 9½

       

lgkj.k] lnL;-&;g vihy /kkjk 224] jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ds vUrxZr jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj }kjk vihy la[;k 165@2002 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 23-11-2002 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh gSA

2- la{ksi esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gSa fd izR;FkhZ@oknh }kjk vihykFkhZx.k@ izfroknhx.k ds fo:) fnukad 8-9-1999 dks ,d okn jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 dh /kkjk 188 ds vUrxZr LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk gsrq lgk;d dysDVj] pkSewa ds U;k;ky; esa bl vk'k; dk izLrqr fd;k fd xzke lkeksn rglhy pkSewa fLFkr vkjkth [kljk la[;k 1363@1 jdck 0-52 gSDVj] [kljk la[;k 1367@2 jdck 0-23 gSDVj dqy fdrk 2 dqy jdck 0-75 gsDVj Hkwfe ftyk dysDVj] t;iqj }kjk vkns'k Øekad 18@,@94@96@11189-94 fnukad 18-12-1996 ds }kjk Fkkuk lkeksn ds Hkou fuekZ.k gsrq vkoafVr dh Fkh ftldk ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 74 fnukad 3-9-1998 iqfyl Fkkuk lkeksn ds uke [kqy pqdk gS rFkk fu;ekuqlkj dCtk Hkh fn;k tk pqdk gS fdUrq izfroknhx.k mDr Hkwfe ij tcju viuk vkf/kiR; LFkkfir djuk pkgrs gSaA vr% izfroknhx.k dks LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk ls ikcUn fd;k tkosA bl ij lgk;d dysDVj] pkSewa us ,di{kh; dk;Zokgh djrs gq, vius fu.kZ; fnukad 30-1-2001 ds }kjk oknh dk okn ,drjQk fMØh dj fn;kA bl fu.kZ; o fMØh ls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZx.k@izfroknhx.k }kjk izLrqr izFke vihy dks Hkh jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj us vius fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 23-11-2002 ds }kjk [kkfjt dj nhA blls vlarq"V gksdj vihykFkhZx.k }kjk ;g f}rh; vihy bl U;k;ky; ds le{k fnukad 2-5-2003 dks izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

3- ;g vihy o"kZ 2003 ls yfEcr gS ,oa blesa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa dk vfHkys[k vkuk vHkh Hkh 'ks"k gSA pwafd ;g izdj.k jktLFkku ljdkj ds gh nks foHkkxksa ds e/; gS rFkk blesa ;g dkuwuh fcUnq fufgr gS fd D;k jktLFkku ljdkj ds gh nks foHkkxksa ds e/; izdj.k jktLo U;k;ky; }kjk lquokbZ ;ksX; gS\ vr% ge U;k;fgr esa izdj.k ds 'kh?kz fuLrkj.k gsrq v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa dk vfHkys[k eaxk;s fcuk gh fuf.kZr djuk mfpr le>rs gSaA

4- bl lanHkZ esa ge ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; fnukad 18-2-2003 tks





Chief Conservator of Forests, Government of A.P. vs. The Collector & Ors. es ikfjr fd;k x;k gS rFkk tks 2003(2) DNJ 462 ij iazdkf'kr gqvk gS dks m)`r djuk mfpr le>rs gSa&

(A) Constitution of India, 1950 - Arts. 131, 226 & 300- Civil Procedure Code, 1908- Secs. 79 & 80 - Order 27 Rule 1 & Order 1 Rule 9 & 10 - Dispute between two departments of State with regard to title of land - Chief Conservator of Forest filed writ petition against order of Commissioner of Survey- "State not arrayed as party - Petition dismissed by High Court- Appeal - Whether maintainable- Held, No- Suit by or Government be filed in the name of Union or State Government as the case may be- Suit/"Writ between two departments of State not maintainable, so also the appeal there against (Para 16).

(B) Constitution of India, 1950-Arts. 131, 226 and 300-Civil Procedure Code, 1908-Secs. 79 & 80, Order 27 Rule 1 & Order 1 Rule 9 & 10 - Suit/Writ between two departments of State Government- Not envisaged in Constitution or CPC-Such practice detrimental to public interest-Direction to constitute committee to settle inter departmental disputes given. (Para 14).

5- izdj.k dh izd`fr dks Hkyh Hkkafr Li"V djus ds fy, ge iSjk 16 ,oa iSjk 14 dk iw.kZr;k mYys[k djuk Hkh mfpr le>rs gSa&

Para 16:

Now, reverting to the facts of the case on hand, we are of the view that after the said statutory order of the Commissioner of Survey, Settlement and Land Record, the matter should have rested there. We have, therefore, no hesitation in coming to the conclusion that it was not only inappropriate but also illegal for the Chief Conservator of Forest, though he might have done so in all good faith, to have questioned the order of the Commissioner of Survey. Settlement and Land Record before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Writ Petition (C) No. 3414 of 1982. The Chief Conservator of Forests as the petitioner can neither be treated as the State of Andhra Pradesh nor can it be a case of misdescription of the State of Andhra Pradesh. The fact is that the State of Andhra Pradesh was not the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petitio











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top