SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 694

G.K.TIWARI
Darshan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mahaveer Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Vijay Soni, for Appellant;
Amritpal Singh Vanar, for Respondent No.1

Dr. TIWARI, M.—This appeal under Section 76 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (in short `the Act') is directed against the impugned judgment dated 18.8.2010 on Additional Divisional Commissioner, Bikaner passed in appeal No. 144/09/L.R. Act.

2. Brief facts of the case are that Gram Panchayat Samejakothi (Sriganganagar) passed a mutation order dated 18.10.2004 through mutation No. 9 by which the disputed land was mutated from the name of deceased Khatedar Ladhu Singh son of Gula Singh to Mahaveer Singh adopted son of Ladu Singh. Aggrieved against this mutation order dated 18.10.2004 of Gram Panchayat Samejakothi, the appellant filed an appeal before Sub-Divisional Officer, Raisinghnagar who allowed the appeal and remanded the case for re-hearing and re-decision to Tehsildar Raisinghnagar by his judgment dated 21.11.2005. Thereafter Tehsildar Raisinghnagar passed the judgment dated 3.1.2007 after hearing both the parties and carried out mutation in favour of the respondent No. 1, as was done earlier by the Gram Panchayat, Samejakothi, vide its mutation No. 95 dated 18.10.2004. This judgment dated 3.1.2007 was challenged before Additional Divisional Commissioner, Bikaner by the a











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top