P.SATHASIVAM, J.CHELAMESWAR
A. Nawab John – Appellant
Versus
V. N. Subramaniyam – Respondent
2. The 5 petitioners herein filed O.S.No.100 of 2004, against one Sengoda Gounder, who is not a party to the Special Leave Petition, essentially, for the specific performance of a registered agreement dated 22-03-1995, of sale of the suit scheduled land admeasuring approximately Acs.2-00 and delivery of possession of the same; in the alternative, it was prayed that the defendant be directed to refund the amount of Rs.12,15,125/- with interest, etc.
3. The parties are referred to in this Judgment as they are arrayed in the abovementioned Suit.
4. It is the case of the Plaintiffs that the abovementioned defendant was indebted to one Mr. Radhakrishnan and also to the Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Limited (for short ‘TNIIC"). It is alleged in the plaint that Sengoda Gounder wanted to clear the debts to the abovementioned two persons before the property is actually conveyed to the plaintiffs. For the said purpose, Sengoda Gounder collected an amount of Rs.12,15,125/- in instalments from the plaintiffs. In spite of receipt of such payment, Sengoda Gounder did not execute the sale deed, on some pretext or other. Therefore, the Suit.
5. Dur
Jayaram Mudaliar vs. Ayyaswami & Ors. ((1972) 2 SCC 200) 16
Vinod Seth vs. Devinder Bajaj ((2010)8 SCC 1) 16
Sanjay Verma vs. Manik Roy (AIR 2007 SC 1332) 17
Smt. Saila Bala Dassi vs. Smt. Nirmala Sundari Dassi & Anr. (AIR 1958 SC 394) 19
Rathnavarma Raja vs. Smt. Vimala (AIR 1961 SC 1299) 21
Mannan Lal vs. Mst. Chhotka Bibi (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors. (AIR 1971 SC 1374) 29
Faizullah vs. Mauladad (AIR 1929 PC 147) 30
P.K. Palanisamy vs. N. Arumugham & Anr. ((2009) 9 SCC 173 and (2012) 13 SCC 539) 36
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.