SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 506

BAJRANG LAL SHARMA, CHAIN SINGH PANWAR
Ram Khiladi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Khadag Singh, for Appellants;
R.K. Gupta, Govt. Advocate, for State

SHARMA, M.—This appeal has been preferred by the appellants under Section 224 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (hereinafter mentioned as the Act) being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the learned Settlement Officer-cum-Revenue Appellate Authority, Bharatpur on 26.3.2002 in appeal No. 87/94.

2. The thumbnail sketch of the appeal in hand is that the appellants filed a regular suit under Section 88 and 188 of the Act against the State of Rajasthan in the Court of Assistant Collector, Bayana (Bharatpur) in the year 1991. The trial Court decreed the suit on 30.9.94 and declared the appellants as khatedar of khasra No. 225 measuring 21 bighas 08 biswas situated in village Peepari on the basis of his long possession. The State Govt. filed the first appeal assailing the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court dated 30.9.1994. The appellate Court accepted the appeal filed by the State of Rajasthan and quashed the impugned judgment and decree by its judgment dated 26.3.2002. The appellants has preferred this second appeal before this Court challenging the judgment and decree passed by the first appellate Court.

3. Heard the learned counsels of the parties.

4. The learned

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top