SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Raj) 280

WANCHOO, DAVE
Subedar Anoop Chand – Appellant
Versus
Bhonrilal – Respondent


Advocates:
D.L. Bhargava, for Applicant; B.D. Qanogo, for Opposite Party.

ORDER:- This is an application by the plaintiff Anoop Chand for leave to file a first appeal in forma pauperis against the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge, Jaipur City dated 30-4-1952. The applicants suit in the trial Court was that the defendant Ram Das had borrowed from him Rs.6,000/- and agreed to mortgage his property and execute a mortgage deed. It was alleged that the defendant had failed to keep his promise and therefore, it was prayed that either a decree for the specific performance of the contract relating to the execution of the mortgage deed be passed against the defendant or, in the alternative a decree for Rs.6,000/- with interest at the rate of 12 per cent P. A. with costs be given against him.

2. The defendant Ram Das traversed the suit saying that he did not sign the agreement dated 12-2-1948 put forward by the plaintiff, that his signatures were obtained only on a blank paper by coercion and that he had not obtained any loan from the plaintiff. The trial Court found the case in favour of the defendant and dismissed the plaintiffs suit. The plaintiff, therefore, wants to prefer an appeal to this Court. In the trial Court he had paid the court-fees but now he




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top