D.S.DAVE
Anandi Lal – Appellant
Versus
Onkar – Respondent
2. The plaintiffs case was that the houses whose description has been given in the plaint, belonged to his father Manak. About 45 years prior to the date of the institution of the suit (which was filed on 30.10.48 in the court of Civil Judge, Jaipur City), his father had adopted the defendant as his son, because he had no natural son of his own by that time from his first wife. After the death of his first wife, he married another wife, who gave birth to the plaintiff. A few years after, the plaintiffs father got angry with the defendant on account of some undesirable activities on his part and so he turned him out of his house.
The defendant then began residing in another house. The plaintiffs father died on 15-6-37 and after his demise, the defendant took forcible possession of certain movable and immovable properties of the deceased and started harassing the plaintiff in several ways. It was, therefore, prayed by the plaintiff that he, being the legitimate son
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.