SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Geeta Mehrotra & Anr. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr. (Misra, J.)
HON'BLE T.S. THAKUR, & HON'BLE GYAN SUDHA MISRA, J.
Geeta Mehrotra & Anr.
Versus
State of U.P. & Anr.
Criminal Appeal No. 1674 of 2012 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 10547/2010), decided on 17.10.2012
Appeal allowed. (Paras 19, 22, 23, 26, 27)
na-iz-la-] 1973] /kkjk 482 lifBr n.M lafgrk] /kkjk 498-d ,oa ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] 1961] /kkjk 3] 4 & ifjokn vfHk[kf.Mr djuk & ifr] mlds ekrk firk] o ifr ds HkkbZ cfguksa ds fo:) iRuh }kjk Øwjrk dk ifjokn & ,Q-vkbZ-vkj- esa muds ukeksa dk ek= vkDlfed lUnHkZ & izFke n`"V;k ekeys ds vHkko ds vk/kkj ij dk;Zokgh dk vfHk[k.Mu pkgk & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & dksbZ ekeyk ugha curk gS & ,Q-vkbZ-vkj- Hkk-n-la-] dh /kkjk 498-d@323@504@506 rFkk ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 3@4 ds rgr vijk/k ds ?kVdksa dk [kqyklk ugha djrh & vihykFkhZ ds fo:) ifjokn vfHk[kf.Mr djus ;ksX; gSA ¼in la[;k 19] 22] 23] 26] 27½
vihy Lohdkj dhA
2. The appellants in spite of the liberty granted to them to move the trial court, have filed this appeal for quashing the proceedings which had been initiated on the basis of a case lodged by the respondent No.2 Smt. Shipra Mehrotra (earlier known as Shipra Seth) against her husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-in-law and sister-in-law. This appeal has been preferred by the sister-in-law, who is appellant No.1 and brother-in-law of the complainant, who is appellant No.2.
3. The case emerges out of the first information report lodged by respondent No.2 Smt. Shipra Mehrotra under Sections 498A/323/504/506 IPC read with Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act bearing F.I.R.No. 52/2004. The F.I.R. was registered at Mahila Thana Daraganj, Allahabad wherein the complainant alleged that she was married to Shyamji Mehrotra s/o Balbir Saran who was living at Eros Garden, Charmswood Village, Faridabad, Suraj Kund Road at Faridabad Haryana as per the Hindu marriage rites and customs. Prior to marriage the complainant and her family members were told by Shyamji Mehrotra and his elder brother Ramji Mehrotra who is appellant No.2 herein and their mother Smt. Kamla Mehrotra and her sister Geeta Mehrotra who is appellant No.1 herein that Shyamji is employed as a Team Leader in a top I.T. Company in Chennai and is getting salary of Rs.45,000/- per month. After negotiation between the parents of the complainant and the accused parties, the marriage of the complainant Shipra Seth (later Shipra Mehrotra) and Shyamji Mehrotra was performed after which the respondent-complainant left for the house of her in-laws.
4. It was stated that the atmosphere in the house was peaceful for sometime but soon after the wedding, when all the relatives left, the maid who cooked meals was first of all paid-off by the aforesaid four persons who then told the complainant that from now onwards, the complainant will have to prepare food for the family. In addition, the above mentioned people started taunting and scolding her on trivial issues. The complainant also came to know that Shyamji was not employed anywhere and always stayed in the house. Shyamji gradually took away all the money which the complainant had with her and then told her that her father had not given dowry properly, therefore, she should get Rupees five lakhs from her father in order to enable him to start business, because he was not getting any job. When the complainant clearly declined and stated that she will not ask her parents for money, Shyamji, on instigation of other accused-family members, started beating her occasionally. To escape every day torture and financial status of the family, the complainant too
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.