R.S.CHAUHAN
Abid Beig – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. The brief facts of the case are that on 31.8.2003, around 1:15 PM, the SHO, Police Station Kotwali. Mr. Surendra Singh (PW.10), received a secret information that there is a person standing in Govind Dev Colony, behind Chogan Stadium, in front of a shop belonging to Genesh Agency. The person is wearing blue and white striped shirt, and coca coloured trousers. He is about forty to forty-five years old. The informant further told him that the person is carrying smack in large quantity. Having received the said information, the said information was sent to the higher officers in compliance with Section 42 of the Act. Devendra Prasad (PW.2), FC was directed to procure the presence of two independent witnesses. Subsequently, at about 1:30 PM, the police par
E. Micheal Raj vs. Narcotic Control Bureau ((2008) 5 SCC 161 = 2008(4) RLW 3549 (SC)) 8
State of NCT of Delhi vs. Ashif Khan ((2009) 4 SCC 42) 8
Bijoy Singh vs. State of Bihar ((2002) 9 SCC 147) 9
H.P. Administration vs. Om Prakash ((1972) 1 SCC 249) 18
Ajay Singh vs. State of Maharashtra (AIR 2007 SC 2188) 28
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1984 SC 1622) 29
Kanhai Mishra @ Kanhaiya Misar vs. State of Bihar ((2001) 3 SCC 451 = RLW 2001(2) SC 321) 29
Kehar Singh & Ors. vs. State (Delhi Administration) ((1988) 3 SCC 609) 29
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.