SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 911

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Indu – Appellant
Versus
Narsingh Das – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
R.K. Thanvi, Sr. Advocate with Narendra Thanvi, for Petitioner;
Sanjeet Purohit, for Respondent(s)

Hon'ble VYAS, J.—In this petition, the petitioner is challenging the validity of order dated 18.10.2011 whereby document Annex. 3 dated 11.5.1969 was accepted for evidence by the trial Court for collateral purpose.

2. As per facts of the case the plaintiff-respondent filed a suit and entire claim was made in the plaint on the basis of a hand-written letter dt. 11.5.1969 on a plain paper. During the pendency of the suit, the petitioner filed an application under O. 13 R. 3, CPC, read with Secs. 17 and 49 of the Registration Act and Secs. 33 and 35 of Indian Stamps Act before the trial Court.

3. In the application it is submitted that document written on plain paper dated 11.5.1969 is neither properly stamped nor registered, therefore, the said document may be rejected. The trial Court allowed the said application filed by the petitioner and document dated 11.5.1969 filed by the plaintiff-respondent was held to be inadmissible in evidence.

4. The plaintiff-respondent preferred writ petition before this Court by way of filing S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4752/2008 but the same was dismissed by this Court on 16.12.2008. However, it was kept upon for the plaintiff-respondent, if he so desi

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top