SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 918

GOVIND MATHUR, R.S.CHAUHAN
Narayan Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Post;
K.R. Bishnoi, Addl. Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble CHAUHAN, J.—Incarcerated in Central Jail Jodhpur, a convicted prisoner, Narayan Ram, sent a letter to this Court which has been treated as a letter petition by this Court.

2. The petitioner has pleaded that vide order dated 19.4.2012, the District Parole Committee Jodhpur had granted him parole for twenty days. However, it has directed him to furnish two sureties of Rs. 30,000/- each and a personal bond of the same amount. According to him, he comes from an extremely poor family. Due to his poverty, the family cannot procure two sureties for the high amount of Rs. 30,000/-. At best, he can furnish a personal bond, but that too not of Rs. 30,000/-. It is only due to his utter poverty that he has never taken the benefit of parole, although he has been incarcerated for the last seven and half years. Therefore, he has prayed that the requirement of furnishing two sureties be dispensed with and the amount of personal bond be reduced.

3. However, the learned Additional Govt. Advocate claims that the petitioner has completed actual sentence of ten years two months and thirteen days and earned a remission of three years, seven months, and four days. Thus he has completed a total peri







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top