SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 1078

SANDEEP MEHTA
Bhagwati Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Hemant Jain, for Petitioner;
A.R. Nikub, Public Prosecutor

Hon'ble MEHTA, J.—The instant misc. petition has been filed on behalf of the accused petitioner Bhagwati Kumar challenging the orders dated 19.2.2011 and 9.4.2012 passed by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) Sriganganagar in Complaint Case No. 195/2011 taking cognization and reading over the accusation to him for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and the order dated 19.10.2012 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, No. 2, Sriganganagar in revision, whereby the aforesaid orders have been affirmed.

2. Learned counsel Mr. Hemant Jain submits that the orders impugned passed by the learned Courts below as well as all the proceedings of the complaint are illegal and amount to an abuse of process of the Court. He submits that the learned Special Judicial Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases), Sriganganagar is not seized of the territorial jurisdiction to try the case. He further submits that the legal notice for demand of money, which was allegedly sent by the complainant to the petitioner was not served on the petitioner. It was received by one Kamal Kumar and therefore, the proceedings of the complaint are absolutely illegal and amount to an abuse of the proc








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top