SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 812

BAJRANG LAL SHARMA
Adu Ram – Appellant
Versus
Sahab Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Dinesh Sain & Rajendra Barar, for Petitioners;
Pradeep Vishnoi, for Respondent No.5/3

SHARMA, M.—This revision petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 230 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred as the Act) being aggrieved by the order passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority/Sriganganagar on 3.5.2012 in appeal on 69/2012.

2. The brief facts of the case in hand are that the non-petitioners No. 1 to 6 filed a regular suit under Sections 88, 188 of the Act against the petitioners in the Court of Sub-Divisional Officer, Karanpur. Along with the regular suit an application for temporary injunction under Section 212 of the Act was also filed by the non-petitioners. The Trial Court issued temporary injunction on 29.7.2005 and restrained the petitioners to maintain status quo pertaining to record of the disputed land. The petitioners filed first appeal in the Court of Revenue Appellate Authority, Shri Ganganager being dissatisfied by the order of the Trial Court. And the Appellate Court passed an ad interim order staying the order dated 29.7.2005 passed by the Trial Court. In the meanwhile, the non-petitioners No. 1 to 6 also filed a separate application before the Revenue appellate Authority, Sriganganagar requesting him for maintenance o




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top