SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 427

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Manohar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
S.S. Rathore, for Petitioner

Hon'ble VYAS, J.—In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing impugned order dated 19.12.2011 (Annex. 9) passed by the District Collector, Barmer upon revision petition filed by one Poonam Singh under Section 97, Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, by which, patta No. 140/04 issued on 20.10.2004 in favour of the petitioner was cancelled.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by the District Collector for quashing patta is totally illegal because the patta was issued in favour of the petitioner upon old possession on the land in question after following procedure under Rules 145 to 148 of the Rules of 1996. The District Collector, Barmer did not examine the report of the Panchayat which is prepared before regularizing the plot of the petitioner.

3. Main contention of the petitioner is that the committee of the Gram Panchayat, Shiv inspected the site and found that the petitioner's possession is old possession and the patta has been issued after due satisfaction with regard to possession of the petitioner, therefore, the District Collector, Barmer illegally quashed the patta issued in favour of the petitioner. Hence, the order impugned deserves to b














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top