SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 136

AMITAVA ROY, MEENA V.GOMBER
Mukesh Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Rajendra Prasad, for Appellants

Hon'ble ROY, CJ.—In assailment is the judgment and order dated 25.2.2013 passed in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4181/2011 thereby rejecting the appellants'/writ petitioners' cavil against construction of Rajiv Gandhi Sewa Kendra (hereinafter referred to as 'the Kendra) over pasture land, as contemplated by them.

2. We have heard Mr.Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel for the appellants/writ petitioners.

3. For the order proposed to be passed, we do not consider it essential to issue formal notice.

4. The appellants/writ petitioners, who represent themselves to be the elected ward panchas of Gram Panchayat, Khijuriya Brahmanan, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the gram panchayat') and also residents within its local limits, have asserted that in terms of the guidelines issued by the Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department of the State prescribing the criteria for selection of a site for construction of Bharat Nirman Rajiv Gandhi Sewa Kendra (IT Centre), the same ought to be made, as far as possible, in the jurisdictional village panchayat building, and in case for want of place thereat, at any other place over government land with prior proposal of the gram















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top