SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 1027

ALOK SHARMA
Jhuthi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Rasool Mohammed – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Khalid Mehmood on behalf of Shamsuddin Ansari, for Petitioner

Hon'ble SHARMA, J.—This petition has been filed against the order dated 7th September, 2012 whereby the application of the respondent no.1 Rasool Mohammed under Order 18 Rule 3 CPC as non-objector before the executing court has been allowed and the trial court has denied the petitioner, as objector to lead rebuttal evidence in the course of execution proceedings.

2. The facts of the case are that Rasool Mohammed respondent-plaintiff (hereinafter 'the plaintiff') instituted a suit for eviction against one Babu Lal respondent No.2 herein and son of the petitioner (hereinafter 'the defendant') before the learned Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Division) No.1, Jaipur City, Jaipur which was dismissed on 6th April, 1998. The plaintiff Rasool Mohammed filed an appeal No.45/1998 against the judgment dated 6th April, 1998 before the learned District & Sessions Judge, Jaipur which was allowed vide order dated 24th November, 1998 and the suit for eviction was decreed in favour of the plaintiff. The order dated 24th November, 1998 passed in appeal has since not been modified, vacated or set aside, the same has attained finality. Consequently, the plaintiff took execution proceedings.

3. In the execu







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top