2013 Supreme(Raj) 135
(Rajasthan High Court)
Jaipur Bench
Mukesh Kumar Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. (Roy, CJ.)
HON'BLE AMITAVA ROY, CJ.
HON'BLE DR. MEENA V. GOMBER, J.
Mukesh Kumar Sharma & Ors.
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 355 of 2013, decided on 01.04.2013
Rajendra Prasad, for Appellants
Headnote:Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, Sec. 92 read with Rajasthan Tenancy (Government) Rules, 1955, Rule 7 — Allotment of Pasture Land — Land reserved for special purposes — Powers of Collector to sanction — Construction of Sewa Kendra over pasture land — Held — Sec. 92 per se does not make it mandatory for the Collector to set apart any land for pasture — Collector in consultation with the Panchayat, is empowered to change the classification of any pasture land for allotment of agricultural or any non-agricultural purposes. (Para )
Appeal dismissed.
jktLFkku Hkw-jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956] /kkjk 92 lifBr jktLFkku dk'rdkjh ¼ljdkj½ fu;e] 1955] fu;e 7 & pkjkxkg Hkwfe dk vkoaVu & fo'ks"k iz;kstukFkZ Hkwfe vkjf{kr dh & eatwjh dh dysDVj dh 'kfDr & pkjkxkg Hkwfe ij lsok dsUnz dk fuekZ.k & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & /kkjk 92 Lo;a fdlh Hkwfe dks pkjkxkg gsrq i`Fkd j[kus ds fy, dysDVj gsrq vkKkid ugha djrh & iapk;r ds ijke'kZ ls dysDVj fdlh pkjkxkg Hkwfe ds oxhZdj.k dks d`f"k ;k fdlh xSj d`f"k iz;kstukFkZ vkoaVu gsrq ifjorZu djus ds fy, l'kDr gSA
vihy [kkfjt dhA
2. We have heard Mr.Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel for the appellants/writ petitioners.
3. For the order proposed to be passed, we do not consider it essential to issue formal notice.
4. The appellants/writ petitioners, who represent themselves to be the elected ward panchas of Gram Panchayat, Khijuriya Brahmanan, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the gram panchayat') and also residents within its local limits, have asserted that in terms of the guidelines issued by the Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department of the State prescribing the criteria for selection of a site for construction of Bharat Nirman Rajiv Gandhi Sewa Kendra (IT Centre), the same ought to be made, as far as possible, in the jurisdictional village panchayat building, and in case for want of place thereat, at any other place over government land with prior proposal of the gram panchayat to that effect. According to them, in the month of June 2010, the respondent-Sarpanch of the gram panchayat concerned, in contravention of the guidelines, started the construction work of such Kendra over the pasture land of the village panchayat situated near his house in Village Rooppura, but could not complete the same, in view of the objections raised by the villagers. They also averred that by order dated 10.6.2010 of the jurisdictional District Collector, Rs.10.00 lacs was sanctioned for construction of the said Kendra. They averred too that the gram panchayat however, vide its resolution dated 30.7.2010, resolved that the Kendra would be constructed near the panchayat building over the available abadi land measuring 47 x 60 feet and located near the Panchayat Headquarters.
5. While the matter rested at that, the appellants/writ petitioners alleged that on 5.1.2011, the gram panchayat conveyed a meeting, in which though no resolution was taken on the issue of construction of the Kendra, eventually, a forged/fabricated decision in this regard was conjured to the effect that the Kendra would be constructed over the pasture land of Village Khijuriya Brahmanan bearing khasra No.1 measuring 4 bighas and 1 biswa situated on the Kanota to Sambaryia Road. According to the appellants/writ petitioners, though they were participants in the said proceedings, they did never concur to this resolution, which in fact had not been adopted. They urged that however, on the basis of this resolution, the respondent-Sarpanch succeeded to get approval for construction of the Kendra over the aforementioned pasture land and though they successively represented before the concerned State authorities, nothing materialized. According to them, this venture is not only in violation of Section 92 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and Rule 7 of the Rajasthan Tenancy (Government) Rules, 1955 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'), the site being located within an area earmarked for Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor Project, it would also eventually result in wastage of public money.
6. The State-respondents, in their reply, while denying the allegation of non-compliance of the above legal provisions, have asserted that the construction works had been started after being accorded technical and financial sanction therefor by the jurisdictional District Collector. They have referred to an application submitted on behalf of the gram panchayat before the Sub Divisional Officer, Bassi to the effect that it has no objection in keeping some land reserved for extension of the residential area and construction of the Centre out of Gochar land located in khasra No.1. According to the answering respondents, the C