MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Harsahay Meena – Appellant
Versus
State of Raj. – Respondent
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for a petty matter the Magistrate has issued non-bailable warrant in a matter in which the police has submitted a negative report. After receiving negative report the Judicial Magistrate recorded the statements of the complainant and witnesses under section 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. took cognizance agaisnt the petitioners and further the petitioners have been summoned through non-bailable warrant. This order of the Judicial Magistrate deserves to be quashed and set aside. The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgment of the Apex Court in Inder Mohan Goswami vs. State of Uttaranchal, (2007) 12 SCC 1. He wants that the cognizance order should not be quashed but at lea
Inder Mohan Goswami vs. State of Uttaranchal ((2007) 12 SCC 1)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.