SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 834

ALOK SHARMA
Nagar Mal – Appellant
Versus
Addl. District Collector, Sikar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
M.M. Ranjan, Sr. Advocate with Rajat Ranjan, for Petitioners

Hon'ble SHARMA, J.—All the three petitions separately challenging the order dated 20.03.2012, passed by the Additional Collector, Sikar in three revision petitions whereby the Addl. Collector has set aside patta Nos.23, 24, 25 issued to each of the petitioners vide order dated 07.12.2009 by the Gram Panchayat Sargoth, are being disposed of by this common order.

2. The case of the petitioners is that they applied for grant of patta of land situate north of Indira Colony in Gram Panchayat Sargoth. It is submitted that their applications were submitted on or about 01.05.2009. According to the petitioners, the applications were processed by the Gram Panchayat Sargoth and three Panches were allegedly appointed under Rule 146 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 (hereinafter 'the Rules of 1996') to inspect the site whereupon they did inspect the site and submit their inspection report. It is stated that the report of Patwari Halka was also asked for and submitted along with evidence of two witnesses. According to the petitioners, on the inspection made under Rule 146 of the Rules of 1996, their possession of houses allegedly existing on the land sought to be regularized was found t











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top