RAGHUVENDRA S.RATHORE
Sandeep Bakshi – Appellant
Versus
Jaipur Development Authority – Respondent
2. The relevant facts of the case are that Smt. Sunita Patni, respondent No.3 had filed an appeal (104/2009) before the respondent Tribunal with the averments that she and others are the recorded Khatedars and are in possession of the land bearing Khasra Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 ad measuring 1 hectare located at village Todi, Ramznilpura. It is situated on 160 feet road between Jagatpura to Agra Road whereupon the respondent is having her residential house, a well with electricity having been installed on it, etc. etc. The aforesaid land of respondent No.3 falls within Sector No. 35 in Jaipur City.
3. In order to finally approve the plan of Sector No. 34 and 35, the respondent Jaipur Development Authority had called for objections and suggestions from public, in respect of which a notification was issued on 16.11.2005 and published in daily newspaper `Daink Bhaskar' on 18.11.2005. The obje
Darshan Lal Nagpal vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. ((2012) 2 SCC 327) 8
Union of India vs. Kushala Shetty & Ors. ((2011) 12 SCC 69) 8
Sayeedur Rehman vs. State of Bihar ((1973) 3 SCC 333) 20
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India ((1978) 1 SCC 248) 20
Mohinder Singh Gill vs. Chief Election Commissioner ((1978) 1 SCC 405) 20
Swadeshi Cotton Mills vs. Union of India ((1981) 1 SCC 664) 20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.