SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 302

SANDEEP MEHTA
Shiv Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
M.K. Garg, for Petitioner;
A.R. Nikub, P.P.;
A.D. Charan, for Respondent No.2

Hon'ble MEHTA, J.—The instant miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner Shiv Prakash challenging the order dated 25.2.2011passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Anoopgarh Camp Gharsana whereby the learned Revisional Court upheld the order dated 1.10.2009 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Gharsana taking cognizance against the petitioner for the offence under Section 9 of the Bovine Animal Act.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that one Ram Niwas submitted a First Information Report against the petitioner at the Police Station Rawla on 23.8.2009. It was alleged in the report that the petitioner caused burn injuries to a stray bull on 21.8.2009. The first informant was informed about the incident by Bhanwarlal over telephone. Mohanlal, Bhanwarlal and Ranjit were alleged to be eye witness of the occurrence. The first informant reached the place of occurrence and verified the information given by Bhanwarlal and thereafter filed the report at P.S. Rawla.

3. The Investigation Agency initiated investigation and ultimately filed a negative final report in the matter. It was concluded in the investigation that Shiv Prakash was having an agricultural fiel









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top