SANDEEP MEHTA
Shiv Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that one Ram Niwas submitted a First Information Report against the petitioner at the Police Station Rawla on 23.8.2009. It was alleged in the report that the petitioner caused burn injuries to a stray bull on 21.8.2009. The first informant was informed about the incident by Bhanwarlal over telephone. Mohanlal, Bhanwarlal and Ranjit were alleged to be eye witness of the occurrence. The first informant reached the place of occurrence and verified the information given by Bhanwarlal and thereafter filed the report at P.S. Rawla.
3. The Investigation Agency initiated investigation and ultimately filed a negative final report in the matter. It was concluded in the investigation that Shiv Prakash was having an agricultural fiel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.