MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Kishan Lal Meena – Appellant
Versus
Joga Ram – Respondent
2. Brief facts giving rise to this revision petition are that one D.B. PIL Petition No.8221/2011 was filed in which Roshan Lal, Sushila Devi, Sardari, Dhapli Devi Badami Devi and Kailash were the parties. On account of illegal mining of Bajri, the PIL petition was filed. In this Public Interest Litigation, the Court passed stay on 5.7.2011 in favour of the petitioners therein. Thereafter on 24.9.2011 the Court recorded the order of displeasure in respect of conduct of accused Joga Ram. Inspite of he order passed by the High Court Collector hand in glove with Abu Bakar, the then SDO, Khetri and other police officials, started region of terror on the petitioner and other family members and threatening was given that thy are required to withdraw the public interest litigation. Thereafter contempt petition No.546 of 2012 was filed on 5.5.2012 by Roshan Lal for compliance of the order dated 5.7.2011. The notices we
Shivji Singh vs. Nagendra Tiwari & Ors. ((2010) 7 SCC 578) 2
Rashmi Kumar (Smt.) vs. Mahesh Kumar ((1997) 2 SCC 397) 2
Mrs. Dhan Laxmi vs. R. Prasanna & Ors. (AIR 1990 SC 494) 2
Vilas Padndurang & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ((2012) 8 SCC 795) 2
Kanwar Pal Singh vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. ((2005) 6 SCC 161) 2
Raju Pandurang Mahale vs. State of Maharashtra ((2004) 4 SCC 371) 2
Gambhirsinh R. Dekare vs. Falgunbhai Chimanbhai Patel ((2013) 3 SCC 697) 7
Adalat Prasad vs. Rooplal Jindal ((2004) 7 SCC 338) 7
India Carat (P) Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka ((1989) 2 SCC 132) 7
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.