PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL
Mohan Lal Saini – Appellant
Versus
Pawan Kumar Sharma – Respondent
2. Brief relevant facts for the disposal of this application are that the respondent-landlord filed suit for eviction against tenant-appellant from the suit premises before the trial Court in the form of Civil Suit No. 182/2003 and the same was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 23.1.2006 and the Appeal No. 2/2006 filed by the appellant under Section 96 CPC was dismissed by the appellate Court vide judgment and decree dated 5.1.2012. The aforesaid civil second appeal under Section 100 CPC was filed by the appellant in which the respondent appeared through his counsel and appeal was dismissed vide order dated 9.7.2012 as not pressed as the parties agreed to dispose of the same on the following terms and conditions:-
"1. Defendant-appellant undertakes to hand over vacant and peaceful possession of the rented premises to the plaintiff-respondent on or before 31st December, 2013. The plaintiff respondent shall not execute
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.