SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 106

BELA M.TRIVEDI
Devki Nandan Pathak – Appellant
Versus
Jumma Khan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Parag Rastogi, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.B. Ojha, for the respondent No.1

Judgment

1. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioners-defendants under Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'), challenging the judgment and order dated 22/02/2001 passed by the Presiding Officer, Rajasthan Wakf Tribunal, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal) in case No.15 of 1999, whereby the Tribunal has allowed the application filed by the respondent-applicant, granting the permanent injunction in respect of the property in question and declaring the sale deed dated 31/01/1997 executed in favour of the petitioner Nos.1 to 4 by the petitioner No.5 as null and void.

2. The facts in nutshell giving rise to the present revision petition are that the respondent No.1-applicant had filed the application being case No.15/1999 under Section 83 of the said Act seeking relief of permanent injunction against the petitioners-non-applicants before the Tribunal for restraining them from taking forcible possession of the property situated at Masjid Kodiyawali, Barpada, Hindaun City, District Karauli (hereinafter referred to as 'the suit premises), and from putting up any construction thereon, and causing any obstruction to












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top