SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 321

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
J.K. RANKA, J.
Smt. Bhanwari Devi & ors.
Vs.
Girraj Prasad & ors.
Civil Misc. Appeal No.1256/2001
Decided on: 25/07/2014

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Smt. Bhanwari Devi, appellant presents in person.

The principle of res ipsa loquitur can be applied in a case involving a motor vehicle accident, where the accident speaks for itself and the driver of the offending vehicle has not been able to prove that he was not negligent.

Headnote:

MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 - SECTION 173 - APPEAL - ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION - ACCIDENT - RASH AND NEGLIGENT DRIVING - LIABILITY OF DRIVER AND OWNER OF OFFENDING VEHICLE - LIABILITY OF DRIVER AND OWNER OF MINI-BUS - APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLE OF RES IPSA LOQUITUR - LIABILITY OF INSURANCE COMPANY - COMPUTATION OF COMPENSATION - DEDUCTION FOR SELF-EXPENSES - MULTIPLIER - LOSS OF LOVE AND AFFECTION - FUNERAL EXPENSES AND LOSS OF ESTATE - RECOVERY OF COMPENSATION FROM OTHER RESPONDENTS - DEPOSIT OF COMPENSATION IN MONTHLY INCOME SCHEME (MIS) - INTEREST ON ENHANCED AMOUNT.

Fact of the Case:

The deceased, Ramavtar, was travelling in a mini bus when a truck collided with the mini bus, resulting in the death of Ramavtar. An FIR was lodged and the police filed a challan in the court. The claimants-appellants, mother and wife of the deceased, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur, seeking compensation. The Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs.2,21,000/- to the claimants-appellants, holding the driver and owner of the truck liable to pay compensation and exonerating the driver and owner of the mini-bus and the Insurance Company from liability.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the driver of the mini-bus was equally responsible for the accident and cannot escape compensation and equally responsible is the owner of the mini-bus and once the mini-bus was duly insured, the Insurance Company is held liable to pay compensation. The court also found that the Tribunal had erred in exonerating the driver/owner of the mini-bus and in wholly and solely holding the truck driver to be involved in the accident.

Issues: 1. Whether the driver of the mini-bus was equally responsible for the accident? 2. Whether the owner of the mini-bus is equally responsible for the accident? 3. Whether the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation? 4. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is adequate?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court applied the principle of res ipsa loquitur and held that the accident speaks for itself and in view of the judgments (supra), the driver of the mini-bus was equally negligent and since the mini-bus was insured where the deceased was sitting and traveling, therefore, the Insurance Company will also pay compensation. 2. The court held that the owner of the mini-bus is equally responsible for the accident as the driver of the mini-bus. 3. The court held that the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation as the mini-bus was duly insured with the Insurance Company. 4. The court held that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is inadequate and enhanced the compensation to Rs.3,66,000/-.

Final Decision: The court partly allowed the appeal and modified and enhanced the impugned order/award dt.10/04/2001 by a further sum of Rs.1,45,000/- so as to make total compensation to the tune of Rs.3,66,000/-. The court directed the Insurance Company to pay the entire amount of Rs.3,66,000/- alongwith interest at the rate of 6% from the date of filing of the claim petition before the Tribunal. The court also directed the Tribunal to deposit 90% of the enhanced amount with interest in the name of mother of the deceased in the Monthly Income Scheme (MIS) in the nearest post office for a period of five years.

Judgment

1. Instant appeal u/s 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 has been filed by the claimants-appellants seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded vide award dt.10/04/2001 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur in claim case No.485/1993 by which a compensation to the tune of Rs.2,21,000/- has been awarded to the claimant-appellant.

2. The brief facts, which have been gathered on perusal of the impugned award as well as record of the Tribunal, are that on 09/04/1993, the deceased Ramavtar, while travelling in the mini bus bearing No.RJ-14-P-1761 from Sanganer to Tonk Phatak, a truck bearing No.RJO-2955, which was being driven by its driver in high speed in a rash & negligent manner, collided with the mini bus near Gangaur Hotel, Sita Mandi, as a result of which deceased Ramavtar sustained severe and grievous injuries on his body and consequently he succumbed to death. An FIR to this effect was lodged in the concerned police station and the police, after investigation, filed challan in the Court.

3. The claimant-appellant submitted claim petition before the Tribunal wherein it was claimed that the deceased was working as a barber and was aged about 30 years at the time of accident. Mother and wife of the deceased both claimed that the deceased was working as a barber and as regards the income of the deceased, while his wife claimed that he was earning Rs.2000/- per month, his mother claimed that he was earning Rs.2100/- per month. Nevertheless, both claimed that they were dependent upon the deceased because even the mother Smt. Bhanwari Devi, the present appellant was also a widow. Though two separate claim petitions were filed, one by Smt. Bajrangi wife of the deceased and the other by Smt. Bhanwari Devi, mother of the deceased with whom two brothers and one sister joined.

4. Before the Tribunal, despite of proper notices, respondents No.1 to 3, who were driver, owner of the offending vehicle (truck), and driver of the mini-bus respectively did not appear and therefore, ex-parte proceedings were drawn against them. It is also on record, as narrated by the Tribunal, that there was no written statement filed by the other respondents as well. However, in the second claim petition, the Insurance Company filed a written statement and the claim was objected by the Insurance Company on the plea that the claim petition was not preferred in the desired proforma nor the driver of the mini bus was made a party. It was further claimed that the accident was on account of rash and negligent driving of the truck driver and that they were not liable in any manner. It was further claimed that the driver of the mini-bus had no valid driving license and accordingly objected to the claim petition and requested for dismissal of the claim.

5. The Tribunal framed as many as five issues including the issue of relief and after considering various statements namely of Smt. Bajrangi, Nathu Lal, Bhanwari Devi, Sita Ram, FIR, Insurance Cover Note, Driving License, Charge Sheet etc. etc., including divorce decree, although awarded a compensation in favour of the claimant-appellant-Smt. Bhanwari Devi to the tune of Rs.2,21,000/-, however, it was held that the amount of compensation awarded is recoverable from respondents No.1 & 2 while the respondents No.3 to 5 were exonerated of the liability by holding that the mistake was of the truck driver.

6. The instant appeal has been filed by the claimants not only to enhance the claim, which according to them is meager and on lower side but also assailing the finding arrived at by the Tribunal by holding the respondents No.1 & 2 (driver and owner of the offending truck) liable to pay compensation severally and jointly and exonerating the respondents No. 3 to 5 from the liability to pay compensation.

7. Counsel for the parties did not appear despite their names having been shown in the cause list. Smt. Bhanwari Devi, claimant-appellant No.1, who is senior citizen and an old aged widowed lady, app












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top