2013 Supreme(Raj) 266
MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, NISHA GUPTA
Gyan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Advocates Appeared
Mohammad Rahil Kamal, for Appellants;
Javed Choudhary, Public Prosecutor, for State
Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Bharatpur, who has thereby convicted accused-appellant Gyan Singh for offence u/Sec. 302 IPC simplicitor and a fine of Rs.1,000 and in default of payment of fine, he was to further undergo simple imprisonment of six months, accused-appellant Shiv Singh was convicted for substantive offence u/Sec. 307 IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment of four years with fine of Rs. 1000 and in default whereof six months simple imprisonment. The rest of the accused-appellants i.e. Rajveer, Indal Singh and Prabhu Dayal along with Shiv Singh were convicted for offence u/Sec. 302 with the aid of Section 149 IPC and were awarded same sentence as given to the accused-appellant Gyan Singh. Similarly, all other four accused-appellants namely; Gyan Singh, Rajveer, Indal Singh and Prabhu Dayal, except Shiv Singh were convicted for offence u/Sec. 307 with the aid of Section 149 IPC and were awarded the same sentence as was given to accused Shiv Singh for his conviction for the substantive offence of Section 307 IPC. All the accused-appellants were convicted for offence u/Sec
Click Here to Read the rest of this document