SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 266

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, NISHA GUPTA
Gyan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Mohammad Rahil Kamal, for Appellants;
Javed Choudhary, Public Prosecutor, for State

Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Bharatpur, who has thereby convicted accused-appellant Gyan Singh for offence u/Sec. 302 IPC simplicitor and a fine of Rs.1,000 and in default of payment of fine, he was to further undergo simple imprisonment of six months, accused-appellant Shiv Singh was convicted for substantive offence u/Sec. 307 IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment of four years with fine of Rs. 1000 and in default whereof six months simple imprisonment. The rest of the accused-appellants i.e. Rajveer, Indal Singh and Prabhu Dayal along with Shiv Singh were convicted for offence u/Sec. 302 with the aid of Section 149 IPC and were awarded same sentence as given to the accused-appellant Gyan Singh. Similarly, all other four accused-appellants namely; Gyan Singh, Rajveer, Indal Singh and Prabhu Dayal, except Shiv Singh were convicted for offence u/Sec. 307 with the aid of Section 149 IPC and were awarded the same sentence as was given to accused Shiv Singh for his conviction for the substantive offence of Section 307 IPC. All the accused-appellants were convicted for offence u/Sec


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top