SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 410

M.N.BHANDARI
Iqbal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harbans Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.S. Hora, for Petitioner.
Mr. N.K. Maloo, Senior Advocate with Mr. V.K. Tamoliya, for Respondent.

ORDER

By this writ petition, a challenge is made to the orders passed by the Rent Tribunal so as Appellate Rent Tribunal issuing certificate of possession.

An application for eviction was filed by the non-petitioner-landlord. It is by invoking Section 9(a) of Rent Control Act, 2001 (in short “the Act”). After adjudication, certificate of possession was issued. On a challenge to the order of the Rent Tribunal so as Appellate Rent Tribunal by a writ petition, the case was remanded back. It was on the ground that opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses was not provided. On remand of the case, the petitioner-tenant made application to take affidavit of two new witnesses. The application aforesaid was dismissed on the ground that the case has been remanded by the High Court only to permit cross-examination of the witnesses, thus new evidence cannot be led by the petitioner. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed on the said application. The challenge is also to the final order passed by the Rent Tribunal so as Appellate Rent Tribunal.

Learned counsel submits that no default was committed by the petitioner-tenant as immediately after notice to pay rent, it was tendered before




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top