IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
Bhupendra Pratap Singh Rathore – Petitioner
Vs.
State of Raj.& Ors. – Respondent
C.W.P. No.12960/2014.
Decided On : 18th December, 2014.
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226, 327 ,243-C, 243K and 243-O - Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 – Section 9, 10 , 101 and 117 - Delimitation Act, 1950 - Sections 8 , 9 , 2(kk), 11F and 12-BB - Constitution/reconstitution/delimitation of Panchayat areas – Challenged - Present purpose and for disposal of instant bunch of writ petitions are that process of delimitation lastly took place in State of Rajasthan, as referred to by respondents in their reply way back in year and thereafter, due to various reasons, delimitation of Panchayati Raj Institutions became inevitable and on account of increase in population pursuant to publication of census figures it was decided by State Government, Department of Panchayati Raj to undertake fresh delimitation exercise of the Panchayat areas by issuing a notification - All objections so received within prescribed time period as alleged were considered and deliberated upon by District Collectors and the matters were thereafter submitted to State Government through Divisional Commissioner concerned and that were examined by State Government through a committee of three Cabinet Ministers and after going through the recommendations process of delimitation was finalized by State Government and the notification as required u/S.101 came to be published in official gazette - Proceedings which are undertaken by District Collectors prior thereto and after deliberation recommendations sent by District Collectors to State Government through Divisional Commissioners is under challenge but fact still remains that after recommendations were sent by District Collectors to State Government through Divisional Commissioners and after matter being examined by State Government through a committee of three Cabinet Ministers and process of delimitation stands finalized and notified in exercise of powers conferred questioning the recommendations made by District Collectors - Held, Allotments of seats to constituencies is a legislative act in nature and could neither be challenged nor court can entertain such challenge and in view of law declared by Apex Court, prohibiting courts to entertain challenge in view in respect of the above aspects, raised by petitioners pertaining to constitution/reconstitution/delimitation of Panchayat areas under gazette notification cannot be entertained by this court u/Art.226 of Constitution and objection and contentions canvassed by petitioners in view of Art.243-C, 243-K read with 243O coupled with law declared by Apex Court, is wholly devoid of substance - Petitioner that in judgment cited by Apex Court, as there was a clear prohibition of S.10(2) of Delimitation Act writ petitions are maintainable as Delimitation Act is not applicable in facts & circumstances of instant case and at same time, there is a bar to interference by courts in matters relating to delimitation of constituencies and wards and that being so principles laid down by the Apex Court are applicable in facts & circumstances of instant case and the gazette notification - Preliminary objections raised by respondents which deserve worth acceptance and keeping in view the mandate of Art.243-O(a) of Constitution read with S.117 of Act once a notification of delimitation of constituencies dt has been published in the official gazette u/S.101 of Act it has got force of law and going by effect of Art.243-O(a), interference by courts in respect of delimitation of constituencies is barred - Writ petitions lack merit and being not maintainable accordingly stand dismissed.
Ajay Rastogi,J
Instant bunch of writ petitions involves a common issue and question of law, therefore, are being considered and decided by this common order.
In this bunch of writ petitions, the petitioners have primarily called in question constitution/reconstitution/delimitation of the respective Panchayat areas; formation of Panchayati Raj Institutions; change of headquarters of Gram Panchayats; and amalgamation & alteration of respective Panchayat areas on the ground that such action/steps have been taken in contravention of the guidelines issued by the State of Rajasthan, Department of Panchayati Raj and the circulars issued by the State Government u/S.101 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 dt.11.07.2014 read with dt.21.07.2014 & dt.12.09.2014, have not been complied with in true spirit and after going through the procedure provided under the scheme of Act, 1994 and the process of constitution/reconstitution/delimitation of the Panchayati Raj Institutions being finalized by the State Government, the Notification issued u/S.101 of the Act, 1994 and published in the official gazette dt.05.11.2014 is constitutionally invalid and deserves to be quashed and set aside.
The facts in brief which are relevant for the present purpose and for disposal of the instant bunch of writ petitions are that the process of delimitation lastly took place in the State of Rajasthan, as referred to by the respondents in their reply, way back in the year 1994 and thereafter, due to various reasons, delimitation of Panchayati Raj Institutions became inevitable and on account of increase in population, pursuant to publication of census figures i.e. Census-2011, it was decided by the State Government, Department of Panchayati Raj to undertake fresh delimitation exercise of the Panchayat areas by issuing a notification dt.02.06.2014 whereby District Collectors of the concerned Districts were delegated the powers to initiate process u/Ss.9, 10 & 101 of the Act, 1994 and pursuant thereto, vide circular dt.11.07.2014, the District Collectors were authorized for re-constituting/constituting Panchayat boundaries of the Panchayat Samitis and in continuation thereof a further clarification was issued clarifying the parameters/guidelines vide another circular dt.21.07.2014 and instructions were issued by the State Government to all the District Collectors to consider various inputs and published the draft of proposed changes with regard to constitution/re-constitution of Panchayati Raj Institutions inviting objections, if any, and proceeding upon the instructions and submit their recommendations to the State Government through Divisional Commissioner concerned. All the objections so received within the prescribed time period, as alleged, were considered and deliberated upon by the District Collectors and the matters were thereafter submitted to the State Government through Divisional Commissioner concerned and that were examined by the State Government through a committee of three Cabinet Ministers and after going through the recommendations, the process of delimitation was finalized by the State Government and the notification, as required u/S.101 of the Act, 1994, came to be published in the official gazette dt.05.11.2014.
In majority of writ petitions, the notification dt.05.11.2014, published in the Rajasthan Extra-Ordinary Gazette in exercise of powers conferred u/Ss.9, 10 & 101 of the Act, 1994 is a subject matter of challenge. However, in few writ petitions, the proceedings which are undertaken by the District Collectors prior thereto and after deliberation, recommendations sent by the District Collectors to the State Government through Divisional Commissioners is under challenge but the fact still remains that after the recommendations were sent by the District Collectors to the State Government through the Divisional Commissioners and after the matter being examined by the State Government through a committee of three Cabinet Ministe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.