SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 505

AJAY RASTOGI, J.K.RANKA
Shiv Prasad Meena – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Amit Mathur, for Petitioner;
Neeraj Batra, for Respondents

Hon'ble RASTOGI, J.—Instant petition is directed against order of the learned Central Administrative Tribunal dt.01.09.2011 declining to interfere in the order dt.16.09.2009 whereby the petitioner's appointment/selection was cancelled for the post of Junior Telecom Officer (JTO) on the pretext that he suppressed material information while the application form was filled, at the stage of participating in the selection process for JTO Examination, 2007.

2. The salient facts which are relevant for appreciation of the present controversy are that the respondents issued an advertisement for selection to the post of JTO by open Competitive Examination, 2007. The examination was conducted on 15.06.2008 in which the petitioner was declared successful on the basis of merit and it was subject to provisionally fulfillment of eligibility conditions. At that stage, the petitioner was required to submit necessary information in the attestation form and in Clause (13) thereof, the petitioner was required to disclose information regarding pendency of criminal cases/trial, if any initiated against hi
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top