MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Virendra Mehta – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
2. Shri M.M. Ranjan, learned senior counsel for the petitioner has argued that the Reporting Officer has given outstanding remarks to the petitioner in respect of APAR of the years 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08. The Reviewing Officer and downgraded those entries respectively to `very good' and `good' in respect of year 2005-06 and 2006-07 and retained `outstanding' entry in respect of the year 2007-08, but the Accepting Officer has further downgraded them to `average' in respect of the year 2005-06 and 2007-08 and `good' in respect of the year 2006-07. Learned senior counsel submitted that as per the judgments
U.P. Jal Nigam & Ors. vs. Prabhat Chandra Jain & Ors. ((1996) 2 SCC 363) 2
Dev Dutt vs. UOI & Ors. ((2008) 8 SCC 725 = 2008(2) RLW 1669 (SC)) 2
Sukhdev Singh vs. UOI & Ors. ((2013) 9 SCC 573) 2
Union of India & Anr. vs. Major Bahadur Singh ((2006) 1 SCC 368) 5
Abhijit Ghosh Dastidar vs. Union of India & Ors. ((2009) 16 SCC 146) 5
Satya Narain Shukla vs. Union of India & Ors. ((2006) 9 SCC 69) 6
K.M. Mishra vs. Central Bank of India & Ors. ((2008) 9 SCC 120) 6
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.