SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 189

P.K.LOHRA
Gopal Kanwar – Appellant
Versus
Shravan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Ravi Bhansali, for Appellants;
Sanjeev Johari, for Respondents

Hon'ble LOHRA, J.—This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 (for short, ‘Act of 1988’) is preferred by the appellant-claimants seeking enhancement of compensation amount quantified and awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhilwara (for short, ‘learned Tribunal’), by its Award dated 21st of January 1998.

2. By the said Award, the learned Tribunal on adjudication of the claim of the appellants under Section 166 of the Act of 1988, assessed compensation to the tune of Rs.1,95,000/- under different heads and thereafter by apportioning 30% contributory negligence of the deceased has worked out total payable compensation to the appellants as Rs.1,36,500/-.

3. Succinctly stated, the facts giving rise to this appeal are that on 29th December 1994 when Digvijay Singh accompanied by one lady Smt. Jamna was going on motorbike bearing No.RJ-06-1M-0095 to Bhilwara, truck bearing No. RSS-5611 coming from opposite direction dashed with the motorbike causing grave and serious injuries to Digvijay Singh as well as pillion rider Smt. Jamna, and eventually both of them succumbed to death on the spot.

4. In the claim petition, cause of accident was attributed to rash






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top