SANDEEP MEHTA
Govind Narayan Purohit – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner Dr.Govind Narayan Purohit with the following prayers :-
“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that by an appropriate, writ order or direction :-
(i) rule 31 of the Rules of 1962 as reproduced above and rule 3(k) of the Rules of 1962 be declared as unconstitutional and ultra vires Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
(ii) or in the alternative, the non-petitioner be directed to determine the seniority of the petitioner while taking into consideration his services in pursuance of the order dated 20/22.4.1978 and to assign him appropriate place in the seniority list of lecturers of E.N.T. and to give all consequential benefits;
(iii) any other order/relief(s) which may be considered just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed;
(iv) writ petition be allowed with cost.”
3. Since the petitioner had challenged the validity and vires of Rule 31 of the Rajasthan Medical (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 1962 (for short, referred to herein after as 'the Rules of 1962'), the matter was initially placed before the Division Bench but
S.B. Patvardhan. vs. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1977 SC 2051) 14
G.P. Doval & Ors. vs. Chief Sec.
Engineering Officers Association. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (AIR 1990 SC 1607) 14
Rudra Kumar Sain vs. Union of India & Ors. (AIR 2000 SC 2808) 14
S.N. Dhingra. vs. Union of India & Ors. (AIR 2001 SC 1535) 14
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.