SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 217

AJAY RASTOGI, J.K.RANKA
Munavirunnisa Begum – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Islam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Nitin Jain, counsel for appellants
Mr. S. Kasliwal, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. RN Vijay, counsel for the respondents.

Judgment :

J.K. Ranka, J.

1. It is the plaintiff’s Special Appeal filed under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance arises out of the judgment & decree dt.17/01/1994 whereby the Regular First Appeal preferred by the defendant No. 2 & 3 (respondents herein) under Section 96 CPC was allowed setting aside the judgment and decree dt.17/03/1986 passed by the trial court in Civil Suit No. 17/1981.

2. The brief facts of the case are stated as under :

2.1 For the sake of brevity and expression, the parties are referred to as per the rank assigned to them in the suit.

3. Plaintiff Malika Zamitul Jamanu Begum filed a suit for declaration, possession & mesne profit on 16/3/1981 with respect to the suit property against defendant No.1 Abdul Kayyum Khan and defendant No.2 Mohd. Islam & defendant No.3 Smt. Sharifan (subsequent purchaser). In the suit, the plaintiff sought herself to be declared as the true owner of the suit property. Such claim was based on an agreement dt. 03/07/1971 (unregistered), allegedly executed by the defendant No.1 in favour of the plaintiff. It is the c
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top