1. The removal of formal defects is dispensed with.

2. We had heard learned counsel appearing for the parties on 25.03.2015, and given time to the appellant to file a better affidavit, explaining the cause of delay, which may also include the circumstances, in which the statement/concession was given by the counsel appearing for the Jaipur Development Authority, on which the writ petition was decided, and to explain as to whether the counsel appearing for the Jaipur Development Authority, at the relevant time, was competent to give any such concession, with or without the consultation of the authorities of the Jaipur Development Authority.

3. An additional affidavit on delay condonation application of the Jaipur Development Authority has been filed on 21.04.2015, stating as follows:-

“1. That I am the officer-in-charge for respondents in the above noted case and I am well conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case as per the official record.

2. That the impugned order was passed on 01.05.2012. The copy of the order was received from counsel for the JDA with an opinion for not filing any appeal. The order and the opinion having been received was placed for reco