SUNIL AMBWANI
Vijay Solvex – Appellant
Versus
Babu Lal – Respondent
1. We have heard learned counsels appearing for the parties.
2. All these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals arise out of an interim injunction order dated 10.02.2011, passed by the trial court in Civil Misc. Case No.36/2010, by which an interim injunction was granted, to the effect that plaintiffs-defendants No.1 to 31 and defendants No.36 to 43, will not sell, transfer, nor will create any substantial charge over the properties, mentioned in Schedule "Ka" to "Cha”. The trial court further directed that both the parties will, in respect of their Companies, which are controlled by them, or of which they are partners, and the Firms, which are mentioned in Schedule "?" to "?”, will submit their six monthly and yearly accounts, duly audited. The rest of the prayers were rejected.
3. Brief facts, as stated in the plaint, giving rise to the suit, and the written statement, are stated in the judgment of learned Single Judge dated 14.03.2012, as follows:-
“2. The short facts giving rise to the present appeals are that the respondent nos. 1 to 5 (original plaintiffs) have filed the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.