SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 263

SUNIL AMBWANI
Vijay Solvex – Appellant
Versus
Babu Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. N.M. Sharma, Mr. A.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Amol Vyas & Prachi Gupta for appellant-Vijay Solvex Ltd.
Mr. Sudhanshu Kasliwal, Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Sukriti Kasliwal for M/s. Raghuvar India Ltd.-respondent No.19
Mr. Sudhir Gupta, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. L.M. Bhardwaj for Roshan Lal Oil Mill Industries-respondent No.27
Mr. N.K. Maloo, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. V.K. Tamoliya for Niranjanlal Data-respondent No.6
Mr. M.M. Ranjan, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. V.K. Sharma for Vijay Data-respondent No.7.
Mr. R.K. Agarwal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. R.K. Daga, Mr. Kamlakar Sharma, Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Alankrita Sharma & Mr. Madhusudan S. Rajpurohit for respondent
Ms. Lalima Purohit for respondent No.38-SBBJ
Mr. Mahendra Goyal for Daya Kishan Data-respondent No.8
Mr. Vikas Jain for Pyare Lal Niranjan Lal & Co.-respondent No.21
Mr. Punit Singhvi for Dhruv Enclave Pvt.Ltd.-respondent No.23
Mr. Sandeep Pathak, for Jhankar Motels P.Ltd- respondent No.26
Mr. Mahendra Gaur, Mr. Anuroop Singhi with Mr.Saurabh Jain, Mr. T.C. Sharma on behalf of Mr. S.S. Hora, for the respondents

JUDGMENT :

1. We have heard learned counsels appearing for the parties.

2. All these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals arise out of an interim injunction order dated 10.02.2011, passed by the trial court in Civil Misc. Case No.36/2010, by which an interim injunction was granted, to the effect that plaintiffs-defendants No.1 to 31 and defendants No.36 to 43, will not sell, transfer, nor will create any substantial charge over the properties, mentioned in Schedule "Ka" to "Cha”. The trial court further directed that both the parties will, in respect of their Companies, which are controlled by them, or of which they are partners, and the Firms, which are mentioned in Schedule "?" to "?”, will submit their six monthly and yearly accounts, duly audited. The rest of the prayers were rejected.

3. Brief facts, as stated in the plaint, giving rise to the suit, and the written statement, are stated in the judgment of learned Single Judge dated 14.03.2012, as follows:-

“2. The short facts giving rise to the present appeals are that the respondent nos. 1 to 5 (original plaintiffs) have filed the s




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top