AMITAVA ROY, VIJAY BISHNOI
Suresh Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
Usha Gurjar – Respondent
Amitava Roy, C.J. :
” The appellant-husband seeks annulment of the judgment and order dated 10.4.2010 passed by the learned Family Court, Udaipur in cases No. 68/06, 169/06 and 15/07 thereby in essence rejecting his application under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, hereinafter referred to as ' the Act' ) for dissolution of his marriage with the respondent-wife and instead directing restitution of conjugal rights of the parties as sought for by her under section 9 of the Act. The respondent-wife ” s application under section 27 of the Act for an order to return her ornaments and other valuable articles given at the time of marriage and allegedly retained by the appellant-husband was however dismissed.
2. We have heard Mr.Shreyansh Mardia, learned counsel for the appellant-husband and Mr. Rajesh Choudhary for the respondent-wife.
3. The pleaded versions of the parties in short would outline the backdrop of the discord. The appellant-husband averred that the parties were married according to the Hindu rites and rituals on 11.2.2005, whereafter the respondent was brought to the matrimonial home. In substance, the appellant-husband stated in his applic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.