SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 573

AMITAVA ROY
Narottam – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

The subject-matter of challenge in the present appeal is the judgment and order dated 30.06.1988 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.4, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Sessions Case No.1/1985 convicting the appellants under section 306 IPC (hereinafter referred to as the 'IPC) and sentencing them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months and also to pay fine of Rs.100/- each, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of one month.

2. I have heard Mr. V.R. Bajwa, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Bhramanand Sandu, learned Public Prosecutor, Rajasthan.

3. The prosecution case is traceable to a statement made by the deceased Seema Devi w/o Naresh Kumar before Police on 29.09.1984 at Military Hospital, Jaipur (Exhibit-P7) to the effect that her brother-in-law Narottam nurtured a vulgar attitude towards her and for that the members of her in-laws family used to call her unchaste. She, however, stated that there was no demand for dowry. She alleged that when she disclosed the above to her husband, he also did not accept her version and instead started suspecting her and thus, being extremely depressed and frustrated, she had doused her





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top