SANDEEP MEHTA
Sarita Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Facts in brief are that the petitioner, having acquired the requisite qualifications for appointment as a Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering in the Government Institutions applied for selection in pursuance of a notification Annexure-3 dated 28.6.2011 issued by the RPSC for recruitment on the post of Lecturer, Mechanical Engineering in the Technical Education Department. The petitioner appeared in the selection process and after being declared successful, was invited for interview vide letter Annexure-4 dated 7.11.2013. Pursuant to the holding of interviews, the RPSC issued a merit list of 46 successful candidates. Out of 46 posts advertised, six were reserved for woman (5-General Woman + 1-Widow) in the Mechanical Engineering Branch. The petitioner’s name was not reflected in the merit list. However, 20 names were reportedly kept in reserve wherein the petitioner’s name finds place at S. No. 6. Five persons above the petitioner in the reserve list Annexure-5 dated 29.11.2013 are all male candidates. The petitioner, thereafter sought information under the Right to Information Act as to the position of the five posts reserved for women candidates. She was communicated by a l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.