SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 551

SANDEEP MEHTA
Sarita Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. M.A. Siddiqui.
For the Respondent: Mr. H.S. Choudhary and Mr. Ajeet Singh Shekhawat.

ORDER :

Facts in brief are that the petitioner, having acquired the requisite qualifications for appointment as a Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering in the Government Institutions applied for selection in pursuance of a notification Annexure-3 dated 28.6.2011 issued by the RPSC for recruitment on the post of Lecturer, Mechanical Engineering in the Technical Education Department. The petitioner appeared in the selection process and after being declared successful, was invited for interview vide letter Annexure-4 dated 7.11.2013. Pursuant to the holding of interviews, the RPSC issued a merit list of 46 successful candidates. Out of 46 posts advertised, six were reserved for woman (5-General Woman + 1-Widow) in the Mechanical Engineering Branch. The petitioner’s name was not reflected in the merit list. However, 20 names were reportedly kept in reserve wherein the petitioner’s name finds place at S. No. 6. Five persons above the petitioner in the reserve list Annexure-5 dated 29.11.2013 are all male candidates. The petitioner, thereafter sought information under the Right to Information Act as to the position of the five posts reserved for women candidates. She was communicated by a l






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top