SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 448

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
SANDEEP MEHTA, J.
Rupendra Soni – Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan and Others – Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 10945 of 2009
Decided On : 2-7-2015

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Nishant Bora.
For the Respondent: Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit, Mr. Manoj Bhandari and Mr. Ramesh Purohit.

Headnote:Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependent of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996, Rule 10 read with Rule 2(c) and 5 - Important ingredients - Dependent upon the deceased government employee - Held - The applicant claiming compassionate appointment under the Rules must be a dependent of deceased government servant - No such case was set-up by the respondent - Order of appointment is grossly illegal, arbitrary and perverse and cannot be sustained. (Paras 22 to 25)

       Petition allowed.

        jktLFkku e`rd jkT; deZpkfj;ksa ds vkfJrksa dh vuqdEik fu;qfDr fu;e] 1996] fu;e 10 lifBr fu;e 2¼x½ vkSj 5 & egRoiw.kZ ?kVd & e`rd jkT; deZpkfj;ksa ij vkfJr & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & fu;eksa ds rgr vuqdEik ds vk/kkj ij fu;qfDr dk nkok dju okys izkFkhZ dks e`rd jkT; deZpkjh dk vkfJr gksuk pkfg;s & izR;FkhZ }kjk ,slk dksbZ ekeyk izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k & fu;qfDr dk vkns'k LFkwy :i ls voS/k] euekuk vkSj vuqfpr gS vr% fLFkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA ¼in la[;k 22 ls 25½

       ;kfpdk Lohdkj dhA

ORDER :

By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking following relief:-

(i) That the appointment letter No. F.(1)(159)/Communication/Ind/PAD/Comp/Ind of the respondent No. 5 (Annexure-P14) may be quashed and set aside.

(ii) That the respondents/department may be directed to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of driver on compassionate grounds under Rules of 1996.

(iii) Any other appropriate order or direction, which may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.

Facts in brief are that Shri Shyam Lal Soni, the father of the present petitioner and the respondent No. 5 Shri Praveen Soni was employed as an Office Assistant in the District Industry Centre, Bhilwara. Shri Shyam Lal Soni passed away on 25.1.2009 while he was in service of the respondent department. The petitioner's mother had passed away before Shri Shyam Lal Soni. The petitioner is the younger son of Shri Shyam Lal Soni and has two sisters and one elder brother, respondent No. 5 Shri Praveen Soni. At the time of the death of Shri Shyam Lal Soni, the petitioner's elder sister was already married and was residing with her husband at Beawar. Petitioner's unmarried sister Ms. Seema started residing with the present petitioner after the death of Shri Shyam Lal. Admittedly, Shri Praveen Soni, acquired graduation degree in Engineering and was working in different private companies at various places viz. Indore, Gurgaon, Jhansi, Bhopal etc. uptil the death of Shri Shyam Lal. Lastly, Shri Praveen was working as a Production Manager in a private concern at Indore.

After the death of Shri Shyam Lal Soni, the petitioner filed an application under Rule 10 of the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependent of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules of 1996) on 26.2.2009 and claimed compassionate appointment in place of his father with a specific plea that he was wholly dependent on his father and had no independent source of income. It was mentioned in the application that the petitioner's unmarried sister Ms. Seema, who was also fully dependent on Shri Shyam Lal Soni had consented for giving compassionate appointment to the petitioner in place of their father. The application also narrated that Shri Praveen Soni, the petitioner’s elder brother being an engineer, was married and was living separately from their father for the last 5 years and was working at Madhya Pradesh and that he was not dependent upon Shri Shyam Lal Soni at the time of his death. The petitioner prayed for being granted appointment on the post of driver because he was possessed of the requisite qualification for appointment on the said post and was also holding a valid driving licence. On 26.2.2009, the respondent No. 5 Shri Praveen Soni also moved an application (Annexure-2) claiming appointment for himself on compassionate basis in place of his late father on the post of Inspector (Weights and Measures). The language of the application (Annexure-2) has a material bearing for resolving the controversy at hand and is reproduced herein-below for the sake of convenience:-

^^lsok esa]

Jheku~ egkizcU/kd

ftyk m|ksx dsUnz] HkhyokM+k&jktLFkku

fo"k; %& vuqdEikRed fu;qfDr ds lEcU/k esaA

lanHkZ %& vkids i= dzekad ,Q4 laLFkk@09@1712 fnukad 11 Qjojh 2009

izkFkhZ %& Jh izoh.k lksuh firk Jh Lo- Jh ';ke yky lksuh fuoklh HkhyokM+k

egksn;th]

mijksDr fo”k;kUrxZr fuosnu gS fd esjs firk Lo- Jh ';ke yky lksuh ¼Lo.kZdkj½ dk;kZy; lgk;d ds in ij ftyk m|ksx dsUnz HkhyokM+k esa dk;Zjr Fks ftudk LoxZokl fnukad 25-1-2009 lsok vof/k ds nkSjku gks x;k FkkA

;g fd esjh ekrk dk Hkh nsgkUr fnukad 10-5-2007 dks gks x;k gS rFkk eSa esjs ifjokj esa esjs firk ds ckn lcls cM+k iq= gWw rFkk ifjokj dk eqf[k;k gksus dh gSfl;r ls ifjokj dk lEiw.kZ Hkkj eq> izkFkhZ ij gh gS rFkk bl dkj.k eSa izkFkhZ vius firk Lo- Jh ';ke yky lksuh dh e`R;q ds i'pkr~ muds LFkku ij vuqdEikRed fu;qfDr i




































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top