IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
P.K. LOHRA, J.
Shree Achalgach Jain Shwetambar Trust & Ors. - Petitioners
Vs.
State of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.8820/2015
Decided On : 24-08-2015
Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 - 23 - Rajasthan Public Trust Rules, 1962 - Rules 22, 18 - Indian Income-tax Act – Sections 66(2) and 34 - Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 - Prohibition to restrain - Movable and immovable properties - Trust-deed - Case are that in village many families reposing faith in Jain religion are living since time immemorial and some of them are professing the tenets of sect - Petitioners, for almost last nine centuries is maintaining a temple, and other movable and immovable properties owned by, and as per prevailing tradition, village and its Haveli Patti of nine villages are being managed by the family of second petitioner - Earlier, second petitioners father and grand-father also remained in helm of affairs - After promulgation of the Act, was registered as a public trust and an order to this effect was passed by third respondent - Copy of registration certificate bearing registration number of the trust as 3/87 is also placed on record. The petitioners have set out a specific case that the Trust is an agglomeration of the persons having faith in Achalgach sect and there is no formal mode of conferment of membership to its followers. With these averments, it is also pleaded that there exists no formal list of members of the Trust – Held, Case are that in village, District many families reposing faith in Jain religion are living since time immemorial and some of them are professing the tenets of sect - As per version of petitioners for almost last nine centuries Sangh is maintaining a temple, and other movable and immovable properties owned by Sangh, and as per prevailing tradition, village Bhinmal and its Haveli Patti of nine villages are being managed by the family of second petitioner - Earlier, second petitioners father and grand-father also remained in helm of affairs of the Sangh - After promulgation of the Act, Sangh was registered as a public trust and an order to this effect was passed by third respondent - Copy of registration certificate bearing registration number of the trust as 3/87 is also placed on record. The petitioners have set out a specific case that the Trust is an agglomeration of the persons having faith in sect and there is no formal mode of conferment of membership to its followers - With these averments, it is also pleaded that there exists no formal list of members of the Trust - As there is no material on record to suggest that learned Assistant Commissioner has acted de-hors the law, the judgment of Apex Court in Calcutta Discount cannot render any assistance to the cause of the petitioners - Legislature has intrusted the learned Assistant Commissioner with the jurisdiction to make necessary inquiry under Section 23 of the Act which includes to determine whether the preliminary state of facts exists as well as the jurisdiction on finding that it does exist – Therefore it is not a fit case wherein extraordinary equitable jurisdiction is to be exercised to stall inquiry and so also to upset the impugned order passed by the learned Assistant Commissioner- Writ petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed
Shree Achalgach Jain Shwetambar Trust, a public trust registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 (for short, 'Act'), with its office bearers have jointly preferred this writ petition to challenge impugned order dated 4th of August, 2015 (Annex.15) passed by Assistant Commissioner, Deavsthan Department Jodhpur with other ancillary reliefs. In substance, the petitioners have craved for issuance of a writ of prohibition to restrain to Assistant Commissioner, Devsthan Department from conducting inquiry under Section 23 of the Act.
Succinctly stated, the facts of the case are, that in village Bhinmal, District Jalore many families reposing faith in Jain religion are living since time immemorial and some of them are professing the tenets of Achalgach sect. As per version of petitioners, for almost last nine centuries Sangh is maintaining a temple, dharmshala and other movable and immovable properties owned by Sangh, and as per prevailing tradition, village Bhinmal and its Haveli Patti of nine villages are being managed by the family of second petitioner as its Mukhiya/head. Earlier, second petitioner's father and grand-father also remained in helm of affairs of the Sangh. After promulgation of the Act, Sangh was registered as a public trust and an order to this effect was passed by third respondent on 21st July, 1987. A copy of registration certificate bearing registration number of the trust as 3/87 is also placed on record. The petitioners have set out a specific case that the Trust is an agglomeration of the persons having faith in Achalgach sect and there is no formal mode of conferment of membership to its followers. With these averments, it is also pleaded that there exists no formal list of members of the Trust. By efflux of time, many followers of Achalgach sect migrated from Bhinmal but their commitment for the Sangh remained undiminished and many of them attend annual function of temple so also other social functions on receiving intimation from Sewak and mouth publicity. It is averred in the petition that since inception of the Trust, members of the Trust have unanimously selected the trustees in a cordial and congenial manner. In fact, they have reposed immense faith in the Trust and as such said atmosphere has created no formal distinction between members and the trustees. Most of the members and trustees are close family members and neighbours. The petitioners have specifically averred in the writ petition that a meeting of general body of Trust was convened on 16th September, 2013 by sending intimation through Sewak/Pujari as per practice and in accordance with the trust-deed, and the said meeting was attended by 22 members. After conclusion of the meeting, a resolution was taken to induct new trustees, namely, Mukesh Kumar S/o Devi Chand, Kishor Mal S/o Shri Tagaji and Vijay Kumar S/o Shri Laxmanji in place of three trustees namely Shri Devichand, Rikhab Chand and Indermal on account of their death. The election of these three trustees facilitated the requisite strength of thirteen trustees of the Trust as per the trust-deed. It is further averred that immediately on election of three new trustees, requisite information was divulged to third respondent by letter dated 20th of September, 2013.
It transpires from the pleadings that second petitioner personally visited the office of third respondent along with list of thirteen trustees and letter dated 20th September, 2013 but the third respondent made an endorsement on the said letter asking second petitioner to furnish details in prescribed Form-8 along with resolution of the Trust. Second respondent also sought explanation about delay in furnishing such information. Thereupon, requisite informations were furnished in the office of third respondent alongwith Form No.8 vide letter dated 29th May, 2015. After receiving the aforesaid letter and the requisite information in prescribed Form No.8, third respondent commenced inquiry under Section 23 of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.