SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 432

J.K.RANKA
Adarsh Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Madanlal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Reashm Bhargava, for Petitioner;
Hanuman Choudhary, for Respondent

Hon'ble RANKA, J.—Instant writ petition by the petitioner-tenant is directed against order dt.26/11/2014 by which the petitioner's applications under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC and Order 8 Rule 1(3) CPC have been dismissed by the lower appellate court.

2. It is an admitted position that a decree of eviction was passed against the petitioner-tenant on the ground of bonafide & reasonable necessity by the trial court on 20/10/2008 and a regular civil appeal, preferred by the petitioner-tenant, is pending for adjudication before the lower appellate court.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that certain subsequent events have developed during the pendency of the appeal, which ought to be brought on record and for such purposes, the petitioner-tenant moved two applications, one under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amending the written statement and the other under Order 8 Rule 1(3) CPC for taking certain documents on record. The subsequent events, as claimed by the petitioner-tenant, are that Mahesh Sharma, son of the respondent-landlord, on whose necessity the suit was decreed, during the pendency of the appeal, had been posted as Marketing Manager in M/s. Varrsana Ispat Ltd., Ahmedabad Unit and has b
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top