SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 434

AJAY RASTOGI, J.K.RANKA
Radhey Shyam – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwati Bai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Pradeep Mathur, for Petitioner;
Samrath Sharma, for Respondent

Hon'ble RANKA, J.—This civil misc. appeal under section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 21.7.2011 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Kota in Civil Misc. Application No.348/2007 whereby the application filed by the appellant for restitution of conjugal rights has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant filed an application under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights before the learned Judge, Family Court, Kota stating therein that his marriage was solemnized with respondent about 9 years back. On 18.4.2007, respondent deserted the house of the appellant-husband after taking her ornaments along with Rs. 50,000/-. It was further averred that the appellant went several times to bring his wife but the father of respondent-wife refused to send her with him. Appellant asked his wife to return the money then she told that as and when the same would be arranged she will accompany with him. That on one day, during the stay at night at the house of father-in- law, he was maltreated and warned that if he again tried to visit them then he will face dire consequences.

3. The respo












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top