PRAKASH GUPTA
Tulsi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Chand Bai – Respondent
1. The instant Civil First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the legal heirs of the original plaintiff Late Shri Lakshmi Narain, who died during pendency of the suit (hereinafter referred to as `the plaintiff-appellants'). Being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and decree dated 1.10.1996 passed by the learned Additional District Judge No.8, Jaipur City, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as `the learned trial court' ) in Civil Suit No.225/1996 whereby the trial court dismissed the civil suit filed by the original plaintiff Lakshmi Narain against the defendant-respondents for specific performance of the agreement dated 31.12.1977, for grant of permanent injunction and for cancellation of the Sale-deed dated 19.11.1982 in favour of defendant-respondent No.2 Abdul Majid.
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the original plaintiff, Lakshmi Narain, filed the present suit on 24/02/1983. It was stated in the plaint that the plaintiff was a tenant and was doing the business of selling betel by putting a
A.C. Arulappan Vs. Smt. Ahalya Naik
P.C. Joshi Vs. State of U.P. And Others
Pradeep Kumar Vs. State of U.P.
Rattan Lal (since deceased) Thorugh His legal Representatives Vs. S.N. Bhalla and Others
Shanmughasundaram and Others Vs. Diravia Nadar (Dead) by L.Rs. And another
V. Muthusami (dead) by LRs., vs. Angammal and others
Kanshi Ram Vs. Om Prakash Jawal and others
P. D’Souza Vs. Shondrilo Naidu
A. Abdul Rashid Khan (Dead) and Others Vs. P.A.K.A. Shahul Hamid and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.