IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
SANDEEP MEHTA, J.
Aladdin & Anr.-Appellant
Vs.
State of Rajasthan -Respondent
S.B.CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1050/2015
Decided On : 19.2.2016
Appeal allowed.
Lokid vkS"kf/k ,oa eu% izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e] 1985] /kkjk 8@15] 52d lifBr lk{; vf/kfu;e] 1872] /kkjk 27 & 580 fdxzk- fofuf"k/k inkFkZ dk vfHkxzg.k & vtuch O;fä ds fo:) ,Q-vkbZ-vkj- ntZ dh xbZ & vUos"k.k djus okyh ,tsalh us u rks rkfydk] QksVksxzkQh o uewus rS;kj djok;s vkSj u gh vfHkxzfgr eky dks mlh n'kk esa U;k;ky; esa is'k vkSj izn'kZ fd;k & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & vfHkdfFkr vfHkxzg.k lEcU/kh vfHk;kstu lk{; dks O;ä fd;k & vfHk;qä dks vkjksiksa ls nks"keqä fd;kA ¼in la- 27] 33 o 35½ vihy Lohdkj dhA
1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellants Aladdin and Gopal being aggrieved of the judgment dated 19.10.2015 passed by the learned Special Judge (NDPS Act Cases) No.2, Chittorgarh in Sessions Case No.92/2014 (8/2004) whereby, they were convicted for the offence under Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act and were sentenced to undergo 15 years’ rigorous imprisonment with a fine of
2. Succinctly stated, facts necessary and germane for disposal of the instant appeal are noted herein below:-
3. Shri Ram Ratan, who was posted as the SHO Police Station Shambhupura, District Chittorgarh received a source information on 3.8.2003 that gunny bags full of illicit poppy straw were lying concealed on govt. forest land near the village Gilund and that the drug smugglers would take them away for illicit trade in narcotics at the earliest opportunity. The information was taken down into writing and a copy thereof was forwarded to the superior officers alongwith H.C. Constable Sh.Chhagan Lal.
4. The SHO, acting in furtherance of the source information collected a team of Police personnel and proceeded to the place where the contraband was reportedly concealed. The search party reached at a clearing in the forest and saw that some hessian and plastic bags with their mouths tied by twine were lying there. No person was seen near or around the bags. The Police party proceeded to open and search the suspicious packages which were 22 in number. Each bag was containing poppy straw. The follow up procedure of sampling and seizure was conducted. On weighment, total weight of the contraband came to be 580 Kgs. Two samples of 500 Gms. each were taken out from every bag and were packed and sealed. The remaining contraband was repacked and sealed in the same bags. The seizure memo was prepared at the spot and after returning back, an FIR No.172/2003 was registered at the Police Station Shambhupura against unknown persons for the offence under Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act.
5. Under directions of the superior Officers, further investigation was handed over to Sh. Suresh Kumar, SHO PS Kanera. The Investigating Officer recorded the statement of the Patwari concerned and procured the revenue record of the place of seizure, which was recorded as government pasture land standing in the name of village Gilund. During the course of the investigation, the Investigating Officer claims to have received information to the effect that the seized poppy straw had been concealed by Gopi Lal Meena of village Medikheda in connivance with Aladdin. Both were arrested. It is alleged that Aladdin gave an information under Section 27 of the Evidence Act to the Investigating Officer revealing that 8 gunny bags of poppy straw were picked up from his house and 14 bags of poppy straw were collected from the house of Gopal and after being loaded on to the tractor of Gopi Lal, were taken to and concealed in the forest from where the recovery was effected later on. A search was made for locating Gopal but he was not found at his residence. The Investigating Officer also claims to have collected evidence to the effect that the tractor No.RJ09-R-5460 was used to transport the poppy straw and it was in the possession and control of the accused Gopi Lal. After initial investigation, charge-sheet was filed against the accused Gopi Lal and Aladdin. Thereafter, the accused Gopal was also arrested and a subsequent charge-sheet was filed against him as well for the offence under Sections 8/15 of the NDPS Act.
6. Charges were framed against the accused for the offences under Sections 8/15 and 8/25 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution examined as many as 32 witnesses in support of its case and exhibited 39 documents. The accused, in their statements under Section 313 Cr.P.C. denied the prosecution allegations. After the statements of the accused had been recorded, the prosecution recalled and re-examined the witnesses PW28 Bharat Kumar, PW29 Bheru Lal, PW30 Nirbhay Ram, PW31 Gopi Lal a
Gian Chand Vs. State of Haryana reported in (2013)14 SCC 420
Vijay Jain Vs. State of M.P. reported in 2013(14) SCC 527
Jitendra and another v. State of M.P.
Vijay Jain Vs. State of M.P. reported in 2013(14) SCC 527
Sundeep Kumar Bafna v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. reported in AIR 2014 SC 1745
Mohmed Inayatullah v. State of Maharashtra" reported in AIR 1976 SC 483
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.