SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 72

SANDEEP MEHTA
Mohd. Rafique – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Vineet Jain, for Mohd. Rafique;
Pankaj Awasthi, Public Prosecutor;
Ms. Farzana Banoo, for Rahmat Bano & Mohd. Shafeeq

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble MEHTA, J.—These two revisions are directed against the order dated 25.04.2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Jodhpur Metropolitan in two appeals, one filed by Mohd. Rafique and the other filed by Smt. Rahmat Bano and Mohd. Shafeeq. The appellate court rejected both the appeals and affirmed the order dated 21.01.2014 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Jodhpur Metro in Criminal Case No.455/2010.

2. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate, by the above order, had accepted the application filed by Smt. Rahmat Bano and Mohd. Shafeeq being the wife and minor son respectively of Shri Mohd. Rafique under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act and directed that Mohd. Rafique shall make payment of an amount of Rs.1,000/- per month to each of the applicants in addition to the maintenance already being received by them under the orders passed by different courts. Shri Mohd. Rafique was also directed not to commit any domestic violence upon Smt. Rahmat Bano and Mohd. Shafeeq.

3. The wife and the son, challenged the order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate by filing an appeal in the Sessions Court on the ground that the learned Magis












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top