AJIT SINGH, NIRMALJIT KAUR
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar Sharma – Respondent
Hon'ble KAUR, J.— Both the writ petitions are being disposed of by the common order as the impugned order is same.
2. The present writ petition has been filed against the judgment and order dated 16th April, 2013 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal vide which both the above Original Applications were allowed and the Annexure-A/1 by which the entire process of examination was cancelled stood quashed with a direction to the respondent department to act further upon the selection process.
3. A notification came to be issued for organizing a selection to the post of Junior Engineer-II (Signal) Pay Band of 9300-34800 + 4200 Grade Pay against 20% intermediate apprentice quota. The applications were invited vide notification dated 6th Sept., 2010 from eligible candidates against three available vacancies in the aforesaid quota. Both the respondents namely Manoj Kumar Sharma and Rajendra Kumar Meena submitted their applications to the aforesaid notification. Both of them appeared for the written examination and qualified the same for paper screening for selection to the post of Junior Engineer-II (Signal). A provisional panel of 3 candidates only for the post of Junior E
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.