SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 667

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Raghuveer Prasad Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Manju Bansal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Rajvir Sharma, for Petitioner;
Pradeep Mathur, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner Raghuveer Prasad Sharma, who is tenant in the premise, of which respondent Smt. Manju Bansal is landlord. Tenancy commenced on 1.10.1984 with a rent of Rs. 500/- per month. When the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (for short `the Act') came into force w.e.f. 1.4.2003, the respondent-landlord filed an application under Section 6 of the Act before the Rent Tribunal, Kota (for short `the Rent Tribunal') which was dismissed vide order dated 28.11.2006 by the Rent Tribunal against which an appeal was filed by the respondent-landlord before the Appellate Rent Tribunal, Kota (for short `the Appellate Rent Tribunal') which was allowed vide order dated 25.4.2008 and on revision, rent was fixed at Rs. 1,050/- per month w.e.f. 1.4.2003. According to the respondent-landlord, a sum of Rs. 69,085/- was due towards arrears of rent. The respondent-landlord filed an application under Section 9(a) of the Act against the petitioner-tenant on the premise that a sum of Rs. 69,085/- was due to be paid by the petitioner-tenant on revision of rent as per order dated 25.4.2008 passed by the Rent Tribunal under Section 6 of the















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top